Park visitors’ experiences and outdoor lighting are linked, but no studies have investigated visitor preferences for lighting in these locations, nor reasons for such preferences. Visitors’ preferences for lighting may help parks regulate and utilize lighting in a way that both protects resources and provides for quality night experiences. Brightness, Correlated Color Temperature (CCT), and context affects human perceptions of lighting. This paper examines these variables and related lighting preferences in settings common to parks: pathways, amphitheaters, and restrooms. Experimental lighting scenarios were setup at Acadia National Park for brightness ranges typical of each setting. CCTs were chosen based on those common for outdoor lighting – 3000K (yellow), 4200K (white), and 6000K (blue-white). Scenario light fixtures were operated by control boxes that enabled participants to switch between the three CCTs and to adjust brightness. A survey and semi-structure interviews collected data from visitors. Participants preferred 3000K at both the restroom and amphitheater, but 4200K at the pathway. A 6000K CCT was undesirable for all locations. Visitors’ preferred brightness ranged from 1.4 lux on the pathway to 10.5 lux at the restroom. The most frequently cited reasons for these choices were the desire to provide natural nighttime light levels, maintain natural darkness, create a soothing or subtle setting, and to avoid tripping or falling. Many participants indicated having both negative and positive experiences in parks caused by outdoor lighting. Parks must address outdoor lighting if they are to comprehensively manage the nighttime environment and nighttime visitor experiences common in these places.
Protected areas, Recreation, Natural Darkness, Visitor Experience
Blobaum, A., & Hunecke, M. (2005). Perceived danger in urban public space: The impacts of physical features and personal factors. Environment and Behavior, 37, 465- 483.
Boyce, P. R., Eklund, N.H., Hamilton, B.J., & Bruno, L.D. (2000). Perceptions of safety at night in different lighting conditions. Lighting Research Technology, 32, 79-91.
Butler, D. L., & Biner, P. M. (1987). Preferred lighting levels: Variability among settings,
behaviors, and individuals. Environment and Behavior, 19, 695-721.
Clark, B. A. (2008). A rationale for the mandatory limitation of outdoor lighting. Melbourne, Australia: Astronomical Society of Victoria Inc. Retrieved from http://asv.org.au/light-pollution.php
Collison, F. & Poe, K. (2013). “Astronomical Tourism”: The astronomy and dark sky program at Bryce Canyon National Park. Tourism Management Perspectives, 7, 1-15.
Farrington, D., & Welsh, B. (2002). Improved street lighting and crime prevention. Justice Quarterly, 19(2), 313- 342.
Fotios, S., Cheal, C., & Boyce, P. R. (2005). Light source spectrum, brightness perception and visual performance in pedestrian environments: A review. Lighting Res. Technol., 37(4), 271-294.
Fotios, S., & Cheal, C. (2010). Stimulus range bias explains the outcome of preferred-illuminance adjustments. Lighting Res. Technol., 42(9), 433-447.
International Dark-sky Association (IDA) & Illuminating Engineering Society (IES), (2011). Joint IDA- IES model lighting ordinance (MLO) with user’s guide. Retrieved from http://www.ies.org/PDF/MLO/MLO_FINAL_June2011.pdf
Izso, L., Lang, E., Laufer, L., Suplicz, S., & Horvath, A. (2009). Psychophysiological, performance and subjective correlates of different lighting conditions. Lighting Research Technology, 41, 349-360.
Johansson, M., Rosen, M., & Kuller, R. (2011). Individual factors influencing the assessment of the outdoor lighting of an urban footpath. Lighting Research Technology, 43, 31–43.
Kenrick, D. T., Goldstein, N. J., & Braver, S. L. (Eds.). (2012). Six degrees of social influence: Science, application, and the psychology of Robert Cialdini. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., Neuberg, S. L., & Schaller, M. (2010). Renovating the pyramid of needs: Contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(3), 292- 314.
Knight, C. (2010). Field surveys of the effect of lamp spectrum on the perception of safety and comfort at night. Lighting Research Technology, 42, 313–329.
Logadottir, A., Christoffersen, J., & Fotios, S.A. (2011). Investigating the use of an adjustment task to set the preferred illuminance in a workplace environment. Lighting Research Technology, 43, 403-422.
Manning, R., Lawson, S., Newman, P., Hallo, J., Monz, C., & Barber, J. (2018). Natural Quiet, Natural Darkness: Managing Noise and Light in the National Parks. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.
Mizon, B. (2002). Light pollution: responses and remedies; Patrick Moore's Practical Astronomy Series. London: Springer.
National Park Service (1997). The visitor experience and resource protection (VERP)
framework: a handbook for planners and managers. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Denver Service Center.
National Park Service (2006). Management policies 2006. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior. Retrieved from http://www.nps.gov/policy/mp2006.pdf
National Park Service (2007). Interim Outdoor Lighting Guidelines (DRAFT), Developed by the Night Sky Team, Version 1.0. Retrieved from http://www.nps.gov/nabr/naturescience/ upload/NPSInterimOutdoorLightingGuidelinesDraft.pdf
National Park Service User Statistics (2019). Report created at https://irma.nps.gov/Stats/
Plitnick, B., Figueiro, M. G., Wood, B., & Rea, M. S. (2010). The effects of red and blue light on alertness and mood at night. Lighting Research Technology,42, 449–458.
Rea, M. S., Bullough, J. D., & Akashi, Y. (2009) Several views of metal halide and high-pressure sodium lighting for outdoor applications. Lighting Research Technology, 41, 297–320.
Rich, C., & Longcore, T. (Eds.). (2006). Ecological consequences of artificial night lighting. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Rickard, L. N; Scherer, C.W. & Newman, S.B. (2011): Exploring attribution of responsibility for visitor safety in a US national park, Health, Risk & Society, 13(6), 527-545
Schiffman, H. R. (2000). Sensation and perception: An integrated approach (5th ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Schroeder, H. & Anderson, L. (1984) Perceptions of personal safety in urban recreation sites. Journal of Leisure Research, 2, 178-194.
Shi, J. (2010). Reducing artificial nighttime light pollution and its impacts. Retrieved from http://www.trianglealumni.org/mcrol/EPA-NNEMS_Light_Pollution_Final. pdf
Smith, B. (2007). Grassroots policy prescription: A case study in light pollution and night sky preservation and natural resource policy making (master’s thesis). Retrieved from https://www.mhsl.uab.edu/dt/2007m/smith.pdf
Smith, B. (2010). Dark park potential: Analysis of prevalence and possibilities of night recreation opportunities in state and national park units. Paper presented at The International Symposium on Society and Resource Management, Corpus Christi, TX.
Smith, B., & Hallo, J. (2011). 2011 Survey on NPS Use and Status of Night Resources. Unpublished report. Clemson University.
Smith, B., & Hallo, J. (2013). A system-wide assessment of night resources and night recreation in the U.S. national parks: A case for expanded definitions. Park Science, 29(2), 54-59.
Stamps III, & Krishnan, V. (2011). Spaciousness and boundary roughness. Environment and Behavior, 38, 841- 872. doi 10.1177/0013916506288052
Steidle, A., Werth, L., & Hanke, E. (2011). You can’t see much in the dark: Darkness affects construal level and psychological distance. Social Psychology, 42(3), 174- 184. doi: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000061
Tuaycharoen, N., & Tregenza, P. R. (2005). Discomfort glare from interesting images. Lighting Research Technology, 37 (4), 329-341.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
All International Journal of Sustainable Lighting (IJSL) content is Open Access, meaning it is accessible online without fee under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0). For any reuse, redistribution, or reproduction of a work, users must clarify the license terms under which the work was produced. Neither the text itself nor the ideas presented in it may be used for commercial purposes.